Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00860
Original file (BC 2013 00860.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-00860

	XXXX	COUNSEL:  NONE

			HEARING DESIRED:  NO


________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

The Fitness Assessments (FAs), dated 15 Apr 12 and 15 Jul 12 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He had a medical condition during the contested FAs, which precluded him from obtaining satisfactory overall ratings.

The medical condition has been validated through a medical evaluation.  His commander did not submit any documentation regarding this case.  

In support of the appeal, the applicant submits a copy of a 8 Dec 12 Medical Condition Determination for FA Test Failures, an AF Form 108, Physical Fitness Education and Intervention Processing, two 15 Apr 12 Chronological Records of Medical Care and his FA history from the AFFMS.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is currently serving in the Air Force Reserve in the grade of Staff Sergeant (E-5).

On 15 Apr 12, the applicant participated in the first contested FA and attained an unsatisfactory score because he failed to complete the sit-up component.

On 15 Apr 12, the applicant was seen by a military medical provider, after failing the first contested, who indicated that he had sustained an abdominal strain during his FA. 

On 15 Jul 12, the applicant participated in the second contested FA and attained another unsatisfactory score because he failed to complete the cardio and push-up components.

On 25 Jul 12, , the applicant was seen by his civilian medical provider, after failing the second contested FA, complaining of abdominal discomfort that occurred during a recent FA. The provider completed documentation stating activity restrictions as follows: no lifting, sit ups, and push-ups for 4 weeks. 

The applicant’s last five FA results are as follows:

Date 
Composite Score
Rating
14 Oct 12
92.67
Excellent 
*15 Jul 12
25.50
Unsatisfactory
*15 Apr 12
59.40
Unsatisfactory
11 Sept 11
84.40
Satisfactory
15 May 11
81.40
Satisfactory

* Contested FA

In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, if an Airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he/she will have the option of being evaluated at the Medical Treatment Facility (MTF) but his/her test will still count unless rendered invalid by the Unit Commander within five days of the assessment.  If the medical evaluation validates the illness/injury, the Unit Commander may invalidate the test results.  The Airman will then be required to retest within five duty days or when capable based on the recommendations of the medical provider and the Exercise Physiologist (EP).

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial and states, in part, the applicant did not provide sufficient evidence to support the claim. While he has provided sufficient documentation to show he was injured, he has not provided documentation from the Unit Commander invalidating the FA. IAW AFI 36-2905 _ AFGM3 and AFGM4, paragraph l0a, dated 3 Jan 12 and 26 Jun 12 respectively, "If the medical evaluation validates the illness/injury, the Unit Commander may invalidate the test results." Simply stated, the
Commander had the option to invalidate the FAs; however, there is no documentation to confirm he/she did so.

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 6 Jan 14 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).

________________________________________________________________


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.	The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.	The application was timely filed.

3.	Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-00860 in Executive Session on 12 May 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	XXXX, Panel Chair
	XXXX, Member
	XXXX, Member




In view of XXXXXX unavailability, XXXXX has signed as Acting Chair Panel. The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-00860:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 6 Jul 12, w/atch.
	Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 7 Nov 12, w/atch.
	Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 Nov 12.




                                  
                                   Acting Panel Chair


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04605

    Original file (BC 2013 04605.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04605 XXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 12 Sep 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 20 Mar...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03075

    Original file (BC 2013 03075.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A list of the applicant’s FAs since she entered the service is as follows: Date Composite Score Sit-Ups Rating 3 Jul 13 75.67 Exempt Satisfactory *15 Apr 13 81.00 25/0.00 Unsatisfactory 23 Nov 12 87.10 38/6.00 Satisfactory 16 Apr 12 84.10 42/7.50 Satisfactory *Contested FA On 16 Dec 13, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB), on the basis that, “The applicant’s injury was validated by the applicant’s medical provider, but there was no...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02538

    Original file (BC 2013 02538.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    For RegAF and AGR Airmen, the FAC (or UFPM where no FAC exists) will enter the FA results in AFFMS on the 6th duty day if the Commander does not invalidate test results or no response from the Commander is received within this timeframe;” Atch 1, Para 10a. Commander memorandum, medical docs, or FAC memorandum).” ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request to remove the contested FA from AFFMS,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02587

    Original file (BC 2013 02587.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his claim, the applicant has submitted a letter from his UFPM and a Standard Form 600, Chronological Record of Medical care, indicating that he had an illness, precluding him from finishing and passing the contested FA and memorandum from his UFPM (not dated) to the Force Support Squadron commander requesting removal of the contested FA from AFFMS. If an AF Form 422 is required, an additional 7 days will be allowed for the AF Form 422 to be generated and provided.” A list of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03235

    Original file (BC 2013 03235.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s last 10 FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Push Ups Rating 23 Aug 13 92.63 Exempt Excellent 29 May 13 21.38 Exempt Unsatisfactory 5 Feb 13 84.10 21/6.00 Unsatisfactory 19 Jul 12 79.67 22/6.30 Satisfactory 13 Mar 12 Exempt Exempt Exempt 21 Oct 11 85.00 19/5.50 Satisfactory *6 Sep 11 73.67 18/5.00 Unsatisfactory *20 Jul 11 81.00 16/4.30 Unsatisfactory 5 Nov 10 96.25 Exempt Excellent 14 May 10 75.20 25/8.00 Good *Contested FA On 14 Feb 14, a similar request was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01087

    Original file (BC 2013 01087.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The medical condition has been validated through a medical evaluation. The applicant’s last eight FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 26 Nov 13 79.00 Satisfactory 26 Jul 13 77.20 Unsatisfactory 1 Mar 13 EXEMPT EXEMPT 31 Dec 12 23.75 Unsatisfactory *10 Sept 12 64.67 Unsatisfactory 27 Feb 12 78.30 Satisfactory *15 Nov 11 68.20 Unsatisfactory *12 May 11 63.00 Unsatisfactory * Contested FA In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, if an Airman becomes injured or ill...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03392

    Original file (BC 2013 03392.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B. While the applicant has not provided a letter from his commander invalidating the FA, he has provided an AF Form 108 signed by his medical provider stating that he did in fact have a medical condition that precluded him from passing the contested FA. Therefore, the majority of the Board recommends the applicant’s records be corrected as indicated below.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03220

    Original file (BC 2013 03220.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03220 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessments (FAs) dated 29 Oct 10, 28 Oct 11, and 16 Nov 12 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The applicant clarifies in his response to the Air Force Evaluation that the FA he is...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02462

    Original file (BC 2013 02462.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    from the Unit CC.” The applicant’s last 5 FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Sit-ups Rating 10 Jun 2013 92.70 64 Excellent *13 Mar 2013 73.70 36 Unsatisfactory 12 Apr 2012 91.60 53 Excellent 20 Oct 2011 88.70 51 Satisfactory 13 Apr 2011 89.70 59 Satisfactory *Contested FA _______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends approval of the applicant’s request to remove the FA dated 13 Mar 13, stating “it is apparent...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01784

    Original file (BC 2013 01784.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 28 Jan 13 0.00 Unsatisfactory 29 Oct 12 68.78 Unsatisfactory 30 Apr 12 88.00 Satisfactory 20 Oct 11 Exempt Exempt *26 Jul 11 67.50 Unsatisfactory * Contested FA On 16 Dec 13 a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB) due to “Insufficient evidence, specifically no commander invalidation.” In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, if an Airman becomes injured...